Test
Back to all Representative Matters
Apr 15, 2013

A&B Successful in Precedent-Setting Municipal Law Case

Christopher J. Williams and Jody E. Johnson, with assistance from Piper Morley, successfully represented the Township of Oro-Medonte in its application at the Superior Court of Justice to determine the status and ownership of the Lake Shore Promenade. In a precedent-setting decision dated March 7, 2013, Justice Howden clarified the law in relation to possessory title and found that there can be no adverse possession against municipal land whether used as a highway or for any other public purposes.

In Oro-Medonte (Township) v. Warkentin, Justice Howden established a new test to determine whether lands held by a municipality are immune from claims of neighboring landowners based on prescriptive rights or adverse possession. This two-pronged test requires that: (i) the land was purchased by or dedicated to the municipality for the use or benefit of the public, or for the use or benefit of an entire subdivision as well as the public at large; and (ii) since its acquisition by the municipality, the land has been used by and is of benefit to the public. 

Justice Howden found that there was an intention to dedicate the land as a public highway but, on a technical point related to the width of the road in certain places, the municipality had no authority to accept the road. However, there was a finding of implied acceptance and Justice Howden found that it was accepted as municipal land for the use and enjoyment of all. As a result, Justice Howden found that the Township of Oro-Medonte met the requirements of this test and that there could be no adverse possession against this municipal land. A trial was ordered to determine whether specific structures constructed on the lands were subject to laches. There is no appeal of Justice Howden's decision.

Areas of Expertise

Related Representative Matters

Representative Matters
Tenants Successful at the Ontario Court of Appeal Vedran Simkic and Matthew Helfand Feb 17, 2022 A group of tenants, represented by Vedran Simkic and Matthew Helfand, litigators at Aird & Berlis... A group of tenants, represented by Vedran Simkic and Matthew Helfand, litigators at Aird & Berlis LLP, successfully obtained leave from, and subsequently overturned, a three-judge panel of the Ontario Divisional Court. In its decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that occupancy limitations ...
Representative Matters
The City of Stratford Successful in Ontario Land Tribunal Decision Christopher J. Williams, Timothy J. Hill, Andrea Skinner and Hansen Wong Nov 03, 2021 The OLT released its decision in 1353837 Ontario Incorporated v Stratford (City), concerning expr... The OLT released its decision in 1353837 Ontario Incorporated v Stratford (City), concerning expropriation of the former Grand Trunk Railway lands in Stratford.
Representative Matters
City of Ottawa Does Not Owe Developer Duty of Care over Contents of Easement Timothy J. Hill, N. Jane Pepino, Mark van Zandvoort and Codie Mitchell Jun 11, 2021 This is an update to our July 25, 2019 bulletin summarizing Justice Sally Gomery’s decision in Ch... This is an update to our July 25, 2019 bulletin summarizing Justice Sally Gomery’s decision in Charlesfort Developments Ltd. v. Ottawa (City of), 2019 ONSC 4460. In that decision, Justice Gomery determined that the City of Ottawa was negligent in failing to advertise to Charlesfor...