skip to main content

We have been advised that fraudulent emails and faxes regarding unclaimed insurance money have been received by members of the public from a source claiming to be Aird & Berlis LLP. These communications are not from Aird & Berlis LLP. Disregard them and do not engage with the sender in any way. Please report the attempted fraud by contacting the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre.

Students | Join Us | Login |
Back to all Representative Matters
Apr 15, 2013

A&B Successful in Precedent-Setting Municipal Law Case

Christopher J. Williams and Jody E. Johnson, with assistance from Piper Morley, successfully represented the Township of Oro-Medonte in its application at the Superior Court of Justice to determine the status and ownership of the Lake Shore Promenade. In a precedent-setting decision dated March 7, 2013, Justice Howden clarified the law in relation to possessory title and found that there can be no adverse possession against municipal land whether used as a highway or for any other public purposes.

In Oro-Medonte (Township) v. Warkentin, Justice Howden established a new test to determine whether lands held by a municipality are immune from claims of neighboring landowners based on prescriptive rights or adverse possession. This two-pronged test requires that: (i) the land was purchased by or dedicated to the municipality for the use or benefit of the public, or for the use or benefit of an entire subdivision as well as the public at large; and (ii) since its acquisition by the municipality, the land has been used by and is of benefit to the public. 

Justice Howden found that there was an intention to dedicate the land as a public highway but, on a technical point related to the width of the road in certain places, the municipality had no authority to accept the road. However, there was a finding of implied acceptance and Justice Howden found that it was accepted as municipal land for the use and enjoyment of all. As a result, Justice Howden found that the Township of Oro-Medonte met the requirements of this test and that there could be no adverse possession against this municipal land. A trial was ordered to determine whether specific structures constructed on the lands were subject to laches. There is no appeal of Justice Howden's decision.

Areas of Expertise

Related Representative Matters

Representative Matters
Charlesfort Developments Awarded $4.5 Million in Damages in Lawsuit with the City of Ottawa Timothy J. Hill, N. Jane Pepino, Mark van Zandvoort, Angela Swan and Dillon Collett Jul 25, 2019 Charlesfort Developments Ltd. has been successful in its lawsuit brought against the City of Ottawa regarding a land use planning matter related to a new condominium development.
Representative Matters
Durham Region Reaches $6.2 Million Settlement Timothy J. Hill and Courtney Raphael Apr 25, 2018 The Region of Durham, represented by Aird & Berlis litigation lawyers Tim Hill and Courtney Raphael, successfully reached a settlement with the City of Oshawa regarding a 12-year legal battle arising from the amalgamation of Durham Region Transit services in 2006. As a result of the settlement, t...
Representative Matters
Supreme Court of Canada Rules in Favour of City of Windsor Christopher J. Williams and Courtney Raphael Dec 08, 2016 The Supreme Court of Canada today issued its decision in a dispute between the City of Windsor and the Canadian Transit Company (“CTC”). The case, argued on April 21, 2016, was an appeal relating to the jurisdiction of the Federal Court to decide matters involving the applicability of municipal b...