CAUTION: We have been advised that fraudulent emails with a modified domain name have been sent by a source purporting to be from Aird & Berlis LLP. These communications are not legitimate and are not from Aird & Berlis LLP. Disregard any such emails and do not engage with the sender or the email in any way. Please report the attempted fraud by contacting the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre and by emailing Aird & Berlis LLP at help@airdberlis.com.

Back to all publications
Nov 2, 2018

Canada’s New Industrial Design Act and Industrial Design Regulations Come into Force on November 5, 2018

By Lola A. Bartoszewicz, PhD, Erica L. Lowthers, PhD, Kimberly A. McManus, PhD, Tony Sabeta, B.Eng. and Kitt Sinden, M.Sc.

On November 5, 2018, Canada’s new Industrial Design Act and Industrial Design Regulations come into force. Below are some key changes to the Act and Regulations

Term:

A maximum term of protection of 10 years from the date of registration or 15 years after the filing date of the application, whichever is longer. Regardless of which term applies, there will be a single maintenance fee due five years after the registration is issued.

Transitional Provisions:

Registrations that have already been issued and applications that have a filing date earlier than the day on which the new Act and Regulations come into force will be governed and dealt with in accordance with the previous Act and Regulations.

Divisional Practice:

A divisional application must be filed no later than two years after the filing date of the earliest original application in the chain, except for divisional applications prompted by a report generated by the Designs Office.

Publication:

Applications will be made available to the public if the application is still pending 30 months after the filing date or priority date.

Prosecution Time:

  • The time permitted for Office Action responses is down to three months. 
  • Only one six month extension of time is permitted.
  • Advanced Examination and Delayed Registration are available.

Novelty:

Currently confusing novelty requirements for a registrable design are replaced with a novelty requirement with respect to citable art that is similar to the novelty requirements for patents in Canada.

Variants:

While applications may include two or more designs, the assessment of variants that do not differ “substantially” has been somewhat strict and arbitrary.  Acceptable variants will now include  two embodiments of a design with different portions shown in solid and stippled lines.

Canada will become part of the Hague Agreement, which provides a system for filing international design applications designating over 60 member countries.

Questions can be directed to any of our designs professionals: Lola Bartoszewicz, Erica Lowthers, Kimberly McManus, Tony Sabeta and Kitt Sinden.

Related Publications

Publications Article
Department of Finance Clarifies Legislative Intent for Amendments to Taxation of Intergenerational Transfers of Businesses By Edward Miller and Robert Santia Jul 23, 2021 On July 19, 2021, the Department of Finance released a statement acknowledging that the amendment... On July 19, 2021, the Department of Finance released a statement acknowledging that the amendments contained in Bill C-208 form part of the Income Tax Act (Canada) and are now law. The July 19 Announcement replaces the June 30 news rel...
Publications Article
Bill C-208: Tax Implications for Family Businesses By Edward Miller and Robert Santia Jul 08, 2021 On June 29, 2021, Bill C-208 received royal assent. Bill C-208 contains amendments to the Income ... On June 29, 2021, Bill C-208 received royal assent. Bill C-208 contains amendments to the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “ITA”) that impact the tax consequences of certain intergenerational transfers by providing exceptions that will allow for the extraction of corporate surplus.
Publications Article
Divisional Court Finds Statutory Severance Pay Calculation is Based on Employer’s Global Payroll By Daria (Dasha) Peregoudova and Maria Gonzalez Jul 06, 2021 On June 15, 2021, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision in Hawkes v. Max Aicher (Nor... On June 15, 2021, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision in Hawkes v. Max Aicher (North America) Limited. The Court held that the payroll threshold for determining whether an employer is a severance payor under section 64 of the Employment Standards...