Test
Back to all publications
Dec 22, 2020

Government of Ontario Extends “COVID-19 Period” Until July 3, 2021

By Lorenzo Lisi and Fiona Brown

Background

Back in May, in response to the enormous economic impact of COVID-19 on both employers and employees alike, the Ontario government passed Ontario Regulation 228/20 Infectious Disease Emergency Leave. The regulation introduced temporary modifications to the Employment Standards Act, 2000 designed to help employers and employees cope with temporary business interruptions caused by COVID-19 and related restrictions. Under the regulation, non-union employees whose wages are reduced or whose hours of work are temporarily reduced or eliminated due to COVID-19 will not be considered statutorily laid off or constructively dismissed. Instead, such employees will be deemed to be on job-protected infectious disease emergency leave in respect of any time during the “COVID-19 period” that they do not perform the duties of their position. Originally, the “COVID-19 period” was scheduled to end on September 4, 2020, six weeks after the state of emergency declared by the Ontario government was terminated. The regulation was amended on September 3, 2020, to revise the expiration of the “COVID-19 period” to January 2, 2021.

Recent Announcement: “COVID-19 period” extended to July 3, 2021

Last week, the Ontario government enacted Ontario Regulation 765/20, which extended the “COVID-19 period” until July 3, 2021. What this means is that under the Ontario Employment Standards Act, 2000, a layoff until July 3, 2021, does not automatically trigger a statutory layoff or constructive dismissal. It effectively stretches the period of layoff until July 3, 2021, (unless there are further amendments) until this would occur.

This is welcome news for employers who had to make staffing determinations by early 2021. It also provides employers who are currently unable to return to normal staffing levels with more time to manage their business and staff without the concern of a deemed statutory termination. What it does not impact is a claim by an employee (who is not bound by an employment agreement allowing lay off during the term of employment) to take the position, at common law, that their employment has been constructively dismissed. As we move out of COVID-19, the courts will likely weigh in on that issue, including what liability employers may face for any period of layoff prior to a recall.

Please don’t hesitate to contact a member of the Aird & Berlis Workplace Law Group for a further discussion.

Areas of Expertise

Related Publications

Publications Article
Addressing Risk Allocation in M&A Transactions Through the Use of Transactional Insurance: A Primer on Representation and Warranty Insurance in the Canadian M&A Market By Jeffrey K. Merk, Gary Volman and Christian Nianiaris Jun 27, 2022 The natural tension between buyers and sellers in merger and acquisition transactions has led to ... The natural tension between buyers and sellers in merger and acquisition transactions has led to countless hours being spent allocating risk and consequences of various elements of that risk...
Publications Article
Bar Exam Breach: Law Society of Ontario Moves Ahead With Claim While Affected Candidates Are Left on Outside Looking In By Hannah Downard and Josh Suttner Jun 17, 2022 On May 25, 2022, following months of investigation, the Law Society of Ontario announced that it ... On May 25, 2022, following months of investigation, the Law Society of Ontario announced that it had commenced an action against Aamer Chaudhry and NCA Exam Guru for their alleged role in the breach and distribution of confidential exam m...
Publications Article
Historic NFT Insider Trading Charges in U.S. of Relevance to Canadian Operators By Russell J. Sanders, Sean Green and Ali Kwinter Jun 16, 2022 On June 1, 2022, the United States Department of Justice laid the first-ever insider trading char... On June 1, 2022, the United States Department of Justice laid the first-ever insider trading charges in relation to digital assets. The accused, Nathaniel Chastain, was arrested in Manhattan, New York, in connection with a scheme to commit insider trading of non-fungible tokens.