Test
Back to all Representative Matters
Dec 8, 2016

Supreme Court of Canada Rules in Favour of City of Windsor

Christopher J. Williams

The Supreme Court of Canada today issued its decision in a dispute between the City of Windsor and the Canadian Transit Company (“CTC”). The case, argued on April 21, 2016, was an appeal relating to the jurisdiction of the Federal Court to decide matters involving the applicability of municipal by-laws raised in an application brought by the CTC.

The City, represented by Chris Williams, Courtney Raphael and Jody Johnson, had successfully brought a motion to strike the CTC’s application on the basis that the Federal Court lacked the jurisdiction to consider the applicability of municipal by-laws in these circumstances. The Supreme Court of Canada agreed with the City and allowed its appeal. As stated by the Supreme Court of Canada, the application of municipal by-laws to Federal undertakings is to be decided by the Superior Courts and not the Federal Court.

The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada is important because it confirms that that the Superior Court is the proper venue for determining the applicability of municipal by-laws.  As well, this decision confirms the appropriate role to be played by the Federal Court of Canada in these matters. This decision is not only important for the City of Windsor, but for all municipalities across Canada.

As background to the case, the City issued repair orders against 114 properties owned by the CTC, which owns and operates the Ambassador Bridge. The CTC and its parent company, Detroit International Bridge, acquired the properties to facilitate the maintenance and expansion of the Ambassador Bridge including their desired second span. The CTC filed an administrative law application to the Federal Court – Trial Division claiming that the properties so acquired for international bridge purposes are a part of a federal undertaking, and, therefore, not subject to municipal by-laws.

Related Representative Matters

Representative Matters
Tenants Successful at the Ontario Court of Appeal Vedran Simkic and Matthew Helfand Feb 17, 2022 A group of tenants, represented by Vedran Simkic and Matthew Helfand, litigators at Aird & Berlis... A group of tenants, represented by Vedran Simkic and Matthew Helfand, litigators at Aird & Berlis LLP, successfully obtained leave from, and subsequently overturned, a three-judge panel of the Ontario Divisional Court. In its decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that occupancy limitations ...
Representative Matters
Aird & Berlis Successful at Supreme Court of Canada Steve J. Tenai, Sanj Sood and Angela Swan Nov 11, 2021 Aird & Berlis successful before the Supreme Court of Canada upholding the dismissal of an applica... Aird & Berlis successful before the Supreme Court of Canada upholding the dismissal of an application under Ontario’s reciprocal enforcement statute to enforce a foreign judgment against our Caribbean state client.
Representative Matters
Federal Court of Appeal Affirms Use of Reverse Class Actions For Copyright Infringement Claims Ken Clark and Lawrence Veregin Sep 08, 2021 On September 8, 2021, the Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in Salna v. Voltage Pictu... On September 8, 2021, the Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in Salna v. Voltage Pictures, LLC, 2021 FCA 176 regarding certification of a reverse class action (i.e. where there is a class of defendants rather than plaintiffs) for pursuing copyright inf...