CAUTION: We have been advised that fraudulent emails with a modified domain name have been sent by a source purporting to be from Aird & Berlis LLP. These communications are not legitimate and are not from Aird & Berlis LLP. Disregard any such emails and do not engage with the sender or the email in any way. Please report the attempted fraud by contacting the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre and by emailing Aird & Berlis LLP at

Back to all publications
May 7, 2019

Province Introduces an Updated Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe

By David P. Neligan

Among the flurry of legislative changes recently announced on May 2, the Province introduced a new Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (“A Place to Grow”).

First introduced in 2006, the Growth Plan outlined a Provincial vision for the management of growth in the Greater Golden Horseshoe by focusing growth in urban areas, encouraging more compact urban development and protecting natural systems and agricultural lands. The Growth Plan was last updated in 2017 with, among other things, revised targets for density and intensification, and policies with respect to major transit station areas.

A Place to Grow closely tracks the proposed amendments first announced by the Province on January 15, 2019. These proposed amendments introduced for the first time the concept of provincially significant employment zones, and adjusted the minimum density and intensification targets for a number of single- and upper-tier municipalities. Aird & Berlis previously reported on the proposed amendments here.

After undergoing a 45-day commenting and review period, the majority of the proposed amendments have found their way into A Place to Grow. Significantly, however, the new Plan introduces for the first time a definition of provincially significant employment zones that can consist of employment areas or mixed-use areas that maintain a significant number of jobs:

  • Provincially Significant Employment Zones - Areas defined by the Minister in consultation with affected municipalities for the purpose of long-term planning for job creation and economic development. Provincially Significant Employment Zones can consist of employment areas as well as mixed-use areas that contain a significant number of jobs.”

Despite numerous requests to include or exclude areas from the new provincially significant employment zones, the maps in A Place to Grow are largely unchanged from what was proposed in January. No zones were removed or added to the 29 provincially significant employment zones identified by the Province in January 2019. However, minor revisions, including technical adjustments to parcel boundaries, were made to some zones based on municipal feedback.

An additional key difference in the new Plan is a further reduction in the minimum intensification targets within the delineated Built-Up Areas ( for the City of Hamilton and the Regions of Peel, Waterloo and York, and in the minimum density targets within the Designated Greenfield Areas ( for the same areas. These targets have now been reduced from 60% of all residential development occurring annually in delineated built-up areas to 50%; and from 80 residents and jobs combined per hectare to 50. The reductions in these targets bring Hamilton, Peel, Waterloo and York in line with the proposed targets for Barrie, Brantford, Guelph, Orillia, Peterborough and the Durham, Halton and Niagara Regions.

The Province has further refined a new policy ( – first introduced in the January 2019 proposed amendments), which provides that municipalities should establish development criteria to be applied when employment lands outside of a designated employment area are proposed to be redeveloped. This criteria is to ensure that any such redevelopment “will retain space for a similar number of jobs to remain accommodated on site.” It is not immediately clear how this policy will be deployed by regional and local municipalities.

A Place to Grow is anticipated to come into effect on May 16, 2019. The proposed transition regulation would require planning decisions to conform to the new Plan once it is in effect, except for planning matters commenced before 2006, or planning matters awaiting a decision from a completed Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing. In addition, the proposed regulation would identify specific ongoing planning matters that may be impacted by the policy changes in the new Plan (for example, the ongoing appeal of Toronto’s Official Plan Amendment 231) and allow them to continue to be subject to previous Growth Plans. The proposed transition regulation is posted on the Environment Registry of Ontario for review and comment until June 1, 2019.

Areas of Expertise

Related Publications

Publications Article
IDEL Extension and a Welcome Case for Employers on Constructive Dismissal and Pandemic Layoffs By Daria (Dasha) Peregoudova Jun 15, 2021 The Government of Ontario has once again extended the period that the infectious disease emergenc... The Government of Ontario has once again extended the period that the infectious disease emergency leave (“IDEL”) will apply. IDEL will now extend to September 25, 2021. Prior to this change, IDEL was scheduled to expire on July 3, 2021.
Publications Article
Ontario’s Infectious Disease Emergency Leave and Constructive Dismissal By Alex Kagan May 27, 2021 On May 29, 2020, the Ontario government enacted Ontario Regulation 228/20: Infectious Disease Eme... On May 29, 2020, the Ontario government enacted Ontario Regulation 228/20: Infectious Disease Emergency Leave, which extended the length of time an employee could be temporary laid off without triggering an automatic termination under the Employment Standards Act. The regulation only a...
Publications Article
Ontario Government Announces Plan to Introduce Legislation Providing for Three Paid Sick Days By Michael F. Horvat and Meghan A. Cowan Apr 29, 2021 On April 29, 2021, the Government of Ontario announced that it would introduce new legislation th... On April 29, 2021, the Government of Ontario announced that it would introduce new legislation that would provide for three paid sick days for employees impacted by COVID-19.