skip to main content





Back to all publications
Sep 28, 2017

Practically Perfect - Errors in Financing Statements

By Timothy Jones and Sean Green

On September 14, 2017, Bill 154, Cutting Unnecessary Red Tape Act, 2017 (the “Bill”), passed its first reading in the provincial legislature.

Among other things, the Bill proposes to amend the Personal Property Security Act (“PPSA”) and the Repair and Storage Liens Act (“RSLA”), aligning them with current Ontario case law regarding errors and omissions in financing statements or financing change statements.

If the Bill becomes law, this would be good news for enterprises that finance, lease or store motor vehicles. The proposed changes will increase certainty as to whether clerical errors in their registrations will invalidate their security interests.

Registering an interest in a motor vehicle under either of these statutes requires a secured creditor to provide, among other things, the vehicle identification number (“VIN”), the debtor’s name and, if the debtor is an individual, their birthdate. Under the current versions of the PPSA and RSLA, an error in any of this information that is “likely to materially mislead” a reasonable person results in the security interest remaining unperfected.1 Since an unperfected interest is subordinate to perfected secured creditors and trustees in bankruptcy, these seemingly-minor clerical errors can lead to large, unexpected losses.

This concept of “materially misleading” appears subjective and ambiguous. Happily for lenders, Ontario courts have clarified the concept, providing that a reasonable person would do two searches: one against the VIN and another against the debtor, such that the secured party’s interest would be discovered even if the debtor’s name or date of birth was erroneously registered. As such, an incorrect name would not “materially mislead” the reasonable searcher if the VIN is accurate, and the security interest would remain perfected notwithstanding the error.2

The Bill proposes to align both statutes with the existing common law treatment of erroneous registrations. If the VIN is accurate and listed in the designated place, and the statement includes the name of at least one debtor and has all other required fields filled in, the Bill provides that an error in the debtor’s name or birthdate will not invalidate the registration.

Secured creditors must continue to be cautious when listing a vehicle’s VIN. Where the VIN is (i) not included (if the vehicle is classified as a consumer good); (ii) included in the wrong place; or (iii) incorrect, the error will leave the security interest unperfected.

The Financial Services Group has extensive experience protecting the rights of secured creditors, and represents many leading companies in the vehicle and equipment financing industries. For more information, please contact any member of the Financial Services Group. Details can be found on our Financial Services web page.

* Sean Green is a 2017-2018 articling student at Aird & Berlis LLP

PPSA, s. 46(4); RSLA, s. 9(2).

2 The leading case is Re Lambert (1994), 20 OR (3d) 108, 119 DLR (4th) 93 (Ont. C.A.); leave to S.C.C. refused. 123 DLR (4th) vii.

Areas of Expertise

Related Publications

Publications Article
ESA Update: Ontario Set to Return to Its Former Public Holiday Pay Calculation By Fiona Brown, Michael F. Horvat and Nicholas Smith May 15, 2018 On May 7, 2018, the Ontario government introduced Ontario Regulation 375/18, signalling the end of the holiday pay calculation recently brought in by Bill 148. As of July 1, 2018, the public holiday pay calculation provided for in the Employment Standards Act, 2000 will revert back to the old for...
Publications Article
Collective Agreement Benefits vs. Paid Emergency Leave – First Look After Bill 148 By Fiona Brown, Michael F. Horvat and Nicholas Smith May 15, 2018 Bill 148 introduced, for the first time in Ontario, a requirement that all employers provide paid leave for the first two days of Personal Emergency Leave taken by an employee in a calendar year. Labour arbitrators are frequently tasked with examining the interplay between the benefits provided u...
Publications Article
Bill 53 Proposes Minimum Pay Rates for Workers Under Government Contracts By Fiona Brown and Nicholas Smith May 14, 2018 In mid-April, the Ontario government introduced Bill 53, the Government Contract Wages Act, 2018 (the “Bill”). The Bill, if passed, will set out new wage rates for workers in certain sectors under contract with government entities.