skip to main content

Back to all publications
Jun 12, 2019

Employment Case Law Update: No Tort of Harassment in Ontario

By Meghan A. Cowan

In its recent decision in Merrifield v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ONCA 205, the Ontario Court of Appeal held that a common law tort of harassment does not exist in Ontario.

The Court’s landmark decision overturned a Superior Court of Justice decision, which had established the new tort of harassment. In those proceedings, the trial judge had found that the elements of the new tort of harassment were satisfied in relation to a constable’s allegations of harassment against his employer, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), with respect to his transfer to a different unit. The trial judge awarded the constable $141,000.00 in general and special damages.

The Ontario Court of Appeal rejected the lower court’s decision and held that no legal authority supported the existence of a tort of harassment. Moreover, the Court of Appeal overturned the lower court’s finding that the tort of intentional infliction of mental suffering had been made out. The Court of Appeal therefore overturned the trial judge’s findings in their entirety and awarded costs to the RCMP.

While the tort of harassment no longer exists in Ontario, harassment in the workplace is still prohibited by the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act as well as the Ontario Human Rights Code. Employers must still comply with these statutory requirements and should therefore ensure that their policies and training are up to date and their investigation processes are current.

Areas of Expertise

Related Publications

Publications Article
The Facts Control the Law By Cynthia R. C. Sefton Jun 12, 2019 A recent Ontario Court of Justice appeal overturned convictions of a company and its supervisor in connection with an accident that occurred at a wood processing facility. Unfortunately, a worker was seriously injured.
Publications Article
Modern Commercial Reality Triumphs in Interest Act Decision By Alyssa Gebert and Jonathan Yantzi Jun 06, 2019 A recent decision from the Court of Appeal for Ontario has reaffirmed the court’s decision in Solar Power Network Inc. v. ClearFlow Energy Finance Corp. that section 4 of the Interest Act should be interpreted in accordance with “modern commercial reality.”
Publications Article
Divisional Court Confirms Expropriation Claimants Not Immune to Interest and Costs Consequences By Ajay Gajaria, David P. Neligan and Rebecca Hines May 16, 2019 The Ontario Divisional Court’s recent decision in Shergar Development Inc. v. City of Windsor1 (“Shergar”) shows expropriation claimants and expropriating authorities alike that an unreasonable claimant will not be insulated from adverse interest and costs consequences in appropriate circumstance...