Recent actions taken by the Trump administration will have significant implications for Canadian companies active in the Cuban market. On April 17, 2019, the U.S. government announced that it will no longer suspend Title III of theCuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996, commonly known as theHelms-Burton Act. Join us as we discuss the implications of Title III and the issues that Canadian companies will need to consider to assess their legal risk.
As of May 2, 2019, U.S. nationals can bring civil claims up to treble damages against any non-U.S. business that may be “trafficking” in property confiscated by the Cuban government after Fidel Castro’s 1959 revolution. Canadian companies with legitimate trade or investments in Cuba need to understand their legal exposure under Title III.
In the first week since the suspension of Title III, more than 6,000 lawsuits have been filed under Title III, estimated at $8 billion. Canadian companies most at risk include those operating in or with commercial arrangements in the mining, financial services and tourism sectors in Cuba.
The broad definition of “trafficking” in confiscated property under the Helms-Burton Act
The interrelationship between Title III and Canada’s Foreign Extraterritorial Measures Act (FEMA) Orders
The need to assess existing contractual arrangements with Cuban entities
The scope of protection for prospective commercial arrangements with Cuban entities
Transferring legal title of Ontario real estate to a bare trust corporation is a common probate planning technique for property owners. In combination with the use of multiple wills, this planning avo...
In the first of this four-part series breaking down the impact of these legislative changes, Eileen Costello and Naomi Mares of Aird & Berlis will review important changes which effectively shift the ...