skip to main content




Back to all publications
Oct 20, 2017

Department of Finance Announces Abandonment of Surplus Stripping Proposals

On Thursday, October 19, 2017, the Department of Finance announced that it will not pursue its proposed measures targeting transactions which are intended to convert income into capital gains (the “Surplus Stripping Proposals”). The Surplus Stripping Proposals were announced in the July 18, 2017 consultation paper released by the Department of Finance (the “Consultation Paper”), which introduced sweeping changes to the taxation of private corporations and their shareholders in Canada.

The abandonment of the Surplus Stripping Proposals should address a number of the major concerns arising from the Consultation Paper, most notably those relating to:

  • the ability of a private corporation to pay non-taxable capital dividends to its shareholder;
  • double-tax for individuals who hold private company shares on death; and
  • additional tax on transfers of a family business to the next generation.

More clarification and details in respect of the other proposals referred to in the Consultation Paper are expected to be announced later this week.

If you or your family holds valuable assets in a Canadian private corporation, we encourage you to contact a member of the Aird & Berlis Tax Group for more details.

Areas of Expertise

Related Publications

Publications Article
The Facts Control the Law By Cynthia R. C. Sefton Jun 12, 2019 A recent Ontario Court of Justice appeal overturned convictions of a company and its supervisor in connection with an accident that occurred at a wood processing facility. Unfortunately, a worker was seriously injured.
Publications Article
Employment Case Law Update: No Tort of Harassment in Ontario By Meghan A. Cowan Jun 12, 2019 In its recent decision in Merrifield v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ONCA 205, the Ontario Court of Appeal held that a common law tort of harassment does not exist in Ontario.
Publications Article
Modern Commercial Reality Triumphs in Interest Act Decision By Alyssa Gebert and Jonathan Yantzi Jun 06, 2019 A recent decision from the Court of Appeal for Ontario has reaffirmed the court’s decision in Solar Power Network Inc. v. ClearFlow Energy Finance Corp. that section 4 of the Interest Act should be interpreted in accordance with “modern commercial reality.”