skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Climate Change / Renewables | Consumer Protection | Ratemaking | Ontario

Sep 28, 2017

Proposed Legislation Would Require Cap and Trade Costs to Be Identified on Ontario Gas Bills

By David Stevens

The Transparency in Gas Pricing Act, 2017 passed second reading on September 21, 2017, and has been referred to the Ontario Legislature’s Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs. This proposed legislation, which is sponsored by an opposition party MP, would require that every gas distributor’s bill clearly, prominently and separately identifies the amount that is reasonably attributable to the distributor’s costs related to complying with obligations under the Cap and Trade program.

As we have discussed in earlier posts (see here and here), the Ontario Energy Board previously determined that Cap and Trade costs will not be presented as a separate line item on natural gas bills. Instead, the Cap and Trade costs are being included as part of the "distribution" costs, with no separate identification or quantification. While there is a privately-run website (Cap & Trade Transparency) that allows consumers to calculate their Cap and Trade costs, the amount is neither obvious nor intuitive on a typical gas distribution bill. 

Before and after the OEB’s decision not to separately identify Cap and Trade costs on gas bills, there has been widespread criticism that the true costs of Cap and Trade are being “hidden” from consumers. Concerns have been raised that this approach will mean that consumers will not fully understand the costs and therefore will not adjust their consumption in response – critics assert that this will blunt the effectiveness of Cap and Trade.

If the Transparency in Gas Pricing Act, 2017 is passed, then the OEB will be required to enact rules requiring gas distributors to clearly and separately identify the amount on each consumer bill that relates to the distributor’s costs to comply with Cap and Trade obligations. This would presumably include not only the cost of carbon allowances, but also the distributor’s own costs to manage compliance as well as the costs associated with carbon abatement programs. 

It is by no means clear that the Transparency in Gas Pricing Act, 2017 will be passed in the immediate future. There is no indication that the Ontario Liberals (who hold a majority of seats) support the proposed legislation. Indeed, the Minister of Energy and other members of his party voted against the bill at second reading. Nevertheless, it will be interesting to see what happens with the proposed legislation as it proceeds to a committee hearing.  

Areas of Expertise

Related Blogs

Posted in: Climate Change / Renewables | Ontario | Practice & Procedure

Insights EnergyInsider
Sell-Out in Final California/Quebec Carbon Allowances Auction Before Ontario Joins By David Stevens Nov 24, 2017 The results from the November 14, 2017, California and Quebec joint auction of greenhouse gas (GHG) allowances were released on November 22, 2017. All available current and future vintage allowances from both Quebec and California were sold at the latest auction. As we have described in previous ...
Directives Issued to IESO and OEB to Prepare Implementation Plans for 2017 LTEP By David Stevens Nov 16, 2017 In late October, Ontario’s Minister of Energy (Glenn Thibeault) issued Directives to the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) and the Ontario Energy Board (OEB), requiring each body to prepare “implementation plans” setting out the steps they intend to take to implement the goals and ob...
Ontario Ministry of Energy Proposes Regulatory Changes to Start Implementing 2017 LTEP By David Stevens Nov 15, 2017 As we discussed in an earlier post, many of the new initiatives set out in Ontario’s 2017 Long-Term Energy Plan (2017 LTEP) will require changes to statutes and/or regulations. Late last month, the Ontario Ministry of Energy announced changes to a couple of regulations to begin implementing annou...