We have been advised that fraudulent emails and faxes regarding unclaimed insurance money have been received by members of the public from a source claiming to be Aird & Berlis LLP. These communications are not from Aird & Berlis LLP. Disregard them and do not engage with the sender in any way. Please report the attempted fraud by contacting the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre.

Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Intellectual Property | Copyright | Europe

Apr 5, 2019

The Dawning of a New Dark Age for Europe

By Ken Clark and Monica Carinci

Darkness looms over the Internet in Europe as members of the European Parliament voted in favour of the proposed directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market. The new rules, which are aimed at providing more protection for rights-holders, have the potential to change internet culture as we know it, and will certainly impact tech companies both large and small.

As discussed in a previous blog post, the two most controversial aspects of the proposed directive are Article 11 and Article 13. Article 11 requires news aggregators to pay publishers for the articles and blog posts that are linked on their platforms, and Article 13 requires “online content sharing providers” to prevent the dissemination of unauthorized protected works. 

The European Council previously clarified that Article 11 will only apply to commercial service providers. Individual users who share articles and blog posts on Twitter will not be charged a “link tax” as was previously thought by critics. Yet, the new rule may still prove disappointing for users who rely on aggregators like Google News, social media sites and Rotten Tomatoes for content, as subscription prices for these platforms may be introduced or increased as a result of the new rule. The effort is likely to be incredibly counterproductive as “link sites” will no longer aggregate traffic for the benefit of the sites they list.

There was a proposal to remove Article 13 – labelled the “meme ban” – immediately prior to the vote. The “meme ban” had already been amended in response to criticism so that protected material could explicitly be used “for purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature, parody and pastiche.” It is unclear, however, how tech companies are expected to interpret proper and improper usage of protected material. The proposal to remove Article 13 failed and critics are left wondering how exactly it will work.

Once formally endorsed by European Council, member states will have 24 months to implement the new rules. European Council has already stated it will approve the measure. 

Will the outcome be the opposite of what seems to be intended – less revenue for content providers? We anticipate that sites will just shut down and avoid Europe, rather than complying, given the already thin margins on providing content. Or, perhaps, users will actually want to pay for the Internet? We remain doubtful, but anything can happen.

Areas of Expertise

Related Blogs

Posted in: European Union | Copyright | Intellectual Property

Insights TheSpotlight
Will the EU Copyright Directive Break the Internet? By Ken Clark and Monica Carinci Nov 12, 2018 On September 12, 2018, the European Union passed a proposed directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market. Once the European Parliament, the European Commission and the Council of the European Union agree on a final form of the directive, member states will be required to amend their own la...

Posted in: Intellectual Property | Court Decision

Insights TheSpotlight
The Value of a Copyrighted Photograph Is Not Necessarily in the Eye of the Beholder By Ken Clark and Stan Fedun Jul 19, 2018 In the May 2018 decision, Gaudreau c Néomédia inc., the Québec Small Claims Court considered the amount of damages to award for the unauthorized use of a copyrighted photograph.

Posted in: Communications

Insights TheSpotlight
The Future of the Internet: Less "Walking Dead" and More "House of Cards"? The FCC and CRTC Consider Implications of Data Caps and Differential Pricing By Ken Clark Sep 22, 2016 Usage-based pricing plans provide consumers with a fixed amount of monthly data for a set price. Once you reach your data cap for the month, access to data either becomes restricted or extra fees are levied. This system provides a great deal of income for ISPs, particularly from online streaming ...

Posted in: Data Security/Privacy

Insights TheSpotlight
What Role Should Canada's Courts Play When it Comes to Regulating Internet Activities? The Supreme Court of Canada to Provide Much Needed Clarification By Aaron Baer Apr 18, 2016 The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to hear two fascinating cases that deal with jurisdictional questions arising from the activities of parties on the internet. As Canadian individuals and businesses engage in more and more conduct over the internet, often with parties that do not have physic...