CAUTION: We have been advised that fraudulent emails with a modified domain name have been sent by a source purporting to be from Aird & Berlis LLP. These communications are not legitimate and are not from Aird & Berlis LLP. Disregard any such emails and do not engage with the sender or the email in any way. Please report the attempted fraud by contacting the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre and by emailing Aird & Berlis LLP at

Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Canada (Federal) | Energy Policy | Facilities | British Columbia

May 4, 2018

Federal Government to Intervene in B.C.’s TransMountain Reference Case

By David Stevens

On May 3, 2018, the federal Minister of Justice Jody Wilson-Raybould announced that the federal government will intervene in the British Columbia government’s reference question to the B.C. Court of Appeal. The Justice Minister indicated that “[w]e are confident in Parliament’s jurisdiction and will intervene on the question in order to defend our clear jurisdiction over interprovincial pipelines.”

As discussed in an earlier post, the B.C. government’s reference case asks the Court of Appeal to affirm its jurisdiction to impose environmental rules on interprovincial pipelines. The rules at issue are set out in a new Part 2.1 to the Environmental Management Act that is titled “Hazardous Substance Permits.” The impact of the proposed legislation (including related regulations) would be to suspend or stop Kinder Morgan’s planned TransMountain Expansion Project, a pipeline project that has already been approved by the federal government (see our previous post on this topic here).

The specific questions posed by the B.C. government to the Court, as set out in an Order in Council, are the following:

  1. Is it within the legislative authority of the Legislature of British Columbia to enact legislation substantially in the form set out in the attached Appendix?
  2. If the answer to question 1 is yes, would the attached legislation be applicable to hazardous substances brought into British Columbia by means of interprovincial undertakings?
  3. If the answers to questions 1 and 2 are yes, would existing federal legislation render all or part of the attached legislation inoperative?

It can be expected that the B.C. and federal governments will take opposite positions on each of these questions. It can also be expected that there will be no resolution or guidance on the reference questions before Kinder Morgan’s May 31st deadline to reach agreements with stakeholders to allow the TransMountain Expansion Project to proceed (see our previous post on this topic here).

Areas of Expertise