skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Ratemaking | Ontario | Energy Policy

Oct 25, 2017

Ontario’s Auditor General Highlights the Cost of the Fair Hydro Plan

By David Stevens

On October 17, 2017, Ontario Auditor General Bonnie Lysyk released a special report titled The Fair Hydro Plan: Concerns About Fiscal Transparency, Accountability and Value For Money. The AG Report is quite critical of the Ontario government’s approach to the “Fair Hydro Plan,” stating (among other things) that the government should have reflected a resulting increase in the Province’s overall debt and noting that the approach chosen by the government will “unnecessarily cost Ontarians billions of dollars.”

The AG Report is consistent with the findings of Ontario Financial Accountability Office (FAO), which we described in an earlier post and in an Energy Regulation Quarterly article. The FAO had indicated that the net cost to Ontarians of the Fair Hydro Plan, which is providing near-term electricity bill savings to consumers, may be as much as $24 billion over 30 years. The AG Report indicates that the costs of the Fair Hydro Plan will be around $40 billion (not including the near term benefits that consumers will obtain).

While the AG Report acknowledges the government’s prerogative to implement an electricity bill reduction policy, strong objections are raised about the manner in which this is being done. Specifically, the AG Report objects to the way that the near-term costs of the Fair Hydro Plan (accumulated debts that will be repaid by ratepayers over time) are categorized as a “regulatory asset” and allocated to entities other than the Ontario government in order to assert that the government’s own debt and deficit are not increased. Apart from the question of whether this approach succeeds (the AG says it does not, and the Province’s financial statements should show the impact of the additional debt), the concern is that the entities that must finance the “regulatory asset” until it’s repaid have a higher cost of borrowing than the government itself. The ultimate impact, according to the AG Report, is that Ontarians will pay $4 billion in unnecessary (extra) interest costs.

The AG Report recommends that the Ontario government: a) record the true financial impact of the Fair Hydro Plan’s electricity rate reduction on the Province’s budgets and consolidated financial statements; and b) use a financing structure to fund the rate reduction that is least costly for Ontarians. In response (found at Appendix 5 to the AG Report), the Ontario government disagrees with the premises in the AG Report and declines to offer any changes. Notably, however, the Ontario government’s response indicates that “while total borrowing costs will not be known until the program is complete, accumulated interest is projected to be considerably less than the estimates in the report of the Financial Accountability Office.”

Areas of Expertise

Related Categories

Related Blogs

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Ratemaking | Alberta

Insights EnergyInsider
Alberta Government Makes First Payment to Electrical Utilities Under Price Cap By Zoë Thoms May 25, 2018 The government of Alberta paid $8.3 million to the electrical utilities in April under the province’s price cap. On June 1, 2017, the government introduced a cap on electricity rates of a maximum of 6.8 cents per kWh.

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Ontario | Ratemaking | Energy Policy

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Rejects Hydro One’s Proposed Acquisition of Orillia Power Distribution By David Stevens Apr 18, 2018 On April 12, 2018, the Ontario Energy Board issued a Decision and Order denying Hydro One Inc.’s application to purchase the shares of Orillia Power Distribution Corporation. The OEB’s Decision explains that Hydro One and Orillia Power have failed to establish that there will be no harm to Orilli...

Posted in: Ratemaking | Practice & Procedure | Ontario

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Issues Its First Decision Using “Proportionate Review” By David Stevens Apr 04, 2018 On March 29, 2018, the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) issued a Decision on Scope of Review in an electricity distributor rate application that is being processed under the OEB’s new proportionate review approach. Under that approach, selected local distribution companies (LDCs) can agree to have thei...