CAUTION: We have been advised that fraudulent emails with a modified domain name have been sent by a source purporting to be from Aird & Berlis LLP. These communications are not legitimate and are not from Aird & Berlis LLP. Disregard any such emails and do not engage with the sender or the email in any way. Please report the attempted fraud by contacting the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre and by emailing Aird & Berlis LLP at

Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Ontario

Apr 20, 2020

OEB Revokes Designation of Gas Storage Areas Proposed for Compressed Air Storage

By Fred D. Cass

On April 9, 2020, the Ontario Energy Board revoked the designation of designated natural gas storage areas known as the Bayfield Pool and the Stanley 4-7-XI Pool in the County of Huron, Ontario. These Pools had been designated as gas storage areas by the OEB in 2012. Designation is intended to protect geological formations for use as gas storage areas. Under the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, every application for a licence relating to a well in a designated gas storage area must be referred to the OEB.

In its decision, the OEB accepted that the Pools are uneconomic to develop as gas storage areas. Since the time of designation of the Pools, gas prices have decreased. The OEB noted the evidence of the applicant regarding low gas price spreads that are an ongoing barrier to development of the Pools and, further, regarding the considerable distance of the Pools from, and cost to connect them to, the Dawn-Trafalgar gas transmission system. The OEB accepted that it is very unlikely that the Pools will be developed as gas storage areas in the foreseeable future.

The applicant’s evidence was that the storage capacity of the Pools of 3.3 billion cubic feet is immaterial to Ontario’s total current natural gas storage capacity of 248 BCF. The OEB agreed that the Pools are not necessary for gas storage security in Ontario.

The applicant submitted to the OEB that it is in the public interest to develop these reservoirs for a more useful purpose as compressed air energy storage facilities. The CAES facilities would be used to store compressed air that could be released to generate electricity at higher-priced, peak demand hours. The applicant indicated that this proposed use of the Pools requires a new government regulation and that it had made a formal request to obtain a CAES regulation. The applicant requested that the revocation of the designation be made conditional upon the issuance of a new regulation, so that the appropriate status of the pools for either natural gas or compressed air storage would be preserved depending on the outcome of the request for a regulation.

The OEB noted that it has no authority over the establishment of regulations regarding CAES and it said that, inasmuch as the applicant had clearly demonstrated that the Pools are uneconomic and unnecessary as natural gas storage areas, it saw no reason to make its approval conditional upon a new regulation. The OEB unconditionally ordered that the designation of the Pools be revoked effective immediately.

Areas of Expertise

Related Categories

Related Blogs

Posted in: Facilities | Ontario | Practice & Procedure

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Approves “Hybrid” Option for Replacement of Natural Gas Pipeline By Fred D. Cass Apr 03, 2020 On April 1, the OEB approved a “hybrid” option for Enbridge Gas Inc.'s application to construct a natural gas pipeline and ancillary facilities replacing approximately 64 kilometres of its Windsor pipeline.

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Issues Decision on Proposal by Municipalities to Form New Natural Gas Distributor By Fred D. Cass Mar 02, 2020 On February 27, the Ontario Energy Board issued a decision in respect of a proposal for a new natural gas distribution company to distribute gas in municipalities located on the north shore of Lake Superior between Nipigon and Sault Ste. Marie.

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Approves 50/50 Sharing of Gain on Sale of Property by Electricity Distributor By Fred D. Cass Jan 29, 2020 We have written separately about the decision of the Ontario Energy Board issued on January 23 in respect of applications made by two electricity distributors, Brantford Power Inc. and Energy+ Inc. In the same decision, the OEB determined the appropriate disposition of a gain...

Posted in: Ratemaking | Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Energy Policy

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Dismisses Application Seeking Revocation of Market Rule Amendments By Fred D. Cass Jan 28, 2020 In September 2019, the Association of Major Power Consumers in Ontario filed an application to the Ontario Energy Board in which it asked the OEB to revoke, and send back for further consideration, a set of amendments to Ontario’s wholesale electricity market rules made by the Independe...

Posted in: Ontario | Energy Policy | Energy Storage | Practice & Procedure

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Decision Confirms Policy and Treatment of Behind-the-Meter Storage Is a Topic for the Responding to DERs Consultation By David Stevens Jan 10, 2020 A recent decision by the Ontario Energy Board in Toronto Hydro’s “Custom IR” rate application confirms that utilities wishing to include behind-the-meter storage in their regulated operations should seek policy changes in the OEB’s ongo...