skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Ratemaking | Practice & Procedure

Sep 7, 2017

OEB Requires More Detail Regarding Operational Concerns Identified in Settlement Proposal

By Fred D. Cass

The OEB issued a decision on August 24, 2017 in which it directed the parties to a Settlement Proposal to make best efforts to revise the Settlement Proposal to provide more information on the nature of operational concerns referred to in it.

The decision arose out of a rates application filed by an electricity distributor, E.L.K. Energy Inc. E.L.K. Energy sought approval of rates on the basis of the OEB’s Price Cap Incentive Rate-setting (IR) model. That is, E.L.K. Energy’s application for approval of rates over five years proposed an initial year of approved base rates followed by four years of Price Cap rate adjustments.

Following a settlement conference in the proceeding, the Settlement Proposal was filed with the OEB on June 29, 2017. The Settlement Proposal reflected the agreement of E.L.K. Energy to withdraw most of its application and the agreement of parties that rates be set using the OEB’s Annual IR Index methodology. E.L.K. Energy also agreed to undertake a regulatory audit, an operational review and an asset condition assessment prior to its next cost of service rebasing application.

In the decision, the OEB said that it would not accept the Settlement Proposal, which the OEB said was in essence a new application using a different rate setting methodology than originally filed. The OEB found that the information provided in the Settlement Proposal to withdraw the initial Price Cap cost of service application and replace it with an Annual IR Index application was not sufficient for it make an informed decision.

The OEB noted that the Settlement Proposal identified a number of concerns regarding E.L.K. Energy’s internal processes and procedures, but found that the Settlement Proposal did not provide sufficient information on the reasons why these concerns were raised. The OEB directed the parties to make best efforts to provide more information on the nature of the operational concerns, supported by examples where applicable, and an overview of the plans to address them. The OEB said that the required details will inform its decision regarding the proposal to withdraw the initial application and replace it with the Annual IR Index application.

The OEB also directed that a revised Settlement Proposal be submitted within 30 days of the date of its decision. Further, the OEB directed that, within the same 30 day period, OEB staff consult with E.L.K. Energy to validate the rate model and information provided to support the Annual IR Index application.

Related Categories

Related Blogs

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Ontario | Ratemaking | Energy Policy

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Rejects Hydro One’s Proposed Acquisition of Orillia Power Distribution By David Stevens Apr 18, 2018 On April 12, 2018, the Ontario Energy Board issued a Decision and Order denying Hydro One Inc.’s application to purchase the shares of Orillia Power Distribution Corporation. The OEB’s Decision explains that Hydro One and Orillia Power have failed to establish that there will be no harm to Orilli...

Posted in: Ratemaking | Practice & Procedure | Ontario

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Issues Its First Decision Using “Proportionate Review” By David Stevens Apr 04, 2018 On March 29, 2018, the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) issued a Decision on Scope of Review in an electricity distributor rate application that is being processed under the OEB’s new proportionate review approach. Under that approach, selected local distribution companies (LDCs) can agree to have thei...

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Ratemaking | Facilities

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Issues its Final Report on Wireline Pole Attachment Charges By David Stevens Mar 26, 2018 On March 22, 2018, the Ontario Energy Board issued its Final Report on Wireline Pole Attachment Charges setting the amount that telecom carriers will pay to attach to electricity poles. In the Final Report, the OEB has set a province-wide charge of $43.63 per pole/per attacher/per year.