Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Ratemaking | Ontario

Jan 27, 2020

OEB Approves Capital Funding Requests by Two Electricity Distributors for a Shared Building

By Fred D. Cass

On January 23, 2020, the Ontario Energy Board issued its decision in respect of Incremental Capital Module (“ICM”) applications made by two electricity distributors, Brantford Power Inc. and Energy+ Inc. As stated in the decision, the OEB’s ICM policy was established to address the treatment of a distributor’s capital investment needs that arise during a Price Cap Incentive Regulation Plan and that are incremental to a calculated materiality threshold.

Brantford Power proposed to consolidate its staff from other facilities into a new administration and operations centre. In order to replace its previous operations centre, Energy+ entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Brantford Power to search for a new facility that could be shared and jointly used. Both distributors sought OEB approval of ICM funding in respect of the new building: Brantford Power proposed to lease out any extra space and did not request any ICM funding in respect of the excess space that it intended to lease; space allocated to the exclusive use of Energy+ was leased by Brantford Power to Energy+ through a finance lease and Energy+ requested ICM funding only for the finance lease portion of its costs.

The OEB approved the ICM funding requests by both distributors. While the eligibility of the Energy+ finance lease for ICM treatment was challenged during the proceeding, the OEB noted that its practice has been to include finance leases in rate base when setting rates. The OEB found it reasonable to provide ICM funding for a project that meets all of the ICM criteria and that would be expected to be part of the future rate base for the utility.

Areas of Expertise

Related Blogs

Posted in: Ontario | Energy Policy | Energy Storage | Practice & Procedure

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Decision Confirms Policy and Treatment of Behind-the-Meter Storage Is a Topic for the Responding to DERs Consultation By David Stevens Jan 10, 2020 A recent decision by the Ontario Energy Board in Toronto Hydro’s “Custom IR” rate application confirms that utilities wishing to include behind-the-meter storage in their regulated operations should seek policy changes in the OEB’s ongo...

Posted in: Energy Policy | Ratemaking | Practice & Procedure | Ontario

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB to Hear Review Motion Regarding Electricity Distributor’s Proposal for New Office By Fred D. Cass Aug 26, 2019 In August 2019, the Ontario Energy Board issued procedural orders with respect to the hearing of a motion for review of its earlier decision on an application made by Energy+ Inc. for approval of an Advanced Capital Module project.

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Ontario

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Announces New Performance Standards For Processing Rate Applications Mar 22, 2019 The OEB is updating its rate application processing performance standards as of April 1, 2019. Current rate application performance standards were established in 2009 and were delineated by hearing type – oral or written. The new performance standards will instead be organized by the ...

Posted in: Ratemaking | Practice & Procedure | Ontario

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Takes Steps Towards Implementing “Activity and Program Based Benchmarking” By David Stevens Mar 01, 2019 On February 25, the Ontario Energy Board staff released their Discussion Paper on Activity and Program Based Benchmarking For Electricity Distributors. The stated objective of APB is “to establish a framework to enable the comparison of utility cost performance in specific capit...