skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Ratemaking | Practice & Procedure

Jan 12, 2018

FERC Rejects Secretary of Energy Direction to Assure Cost Recovery for Coal and Nuclear Generators

By David Stevens

On January 8, 2018, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an Order terminating a rulemaking proceeding ordered by the U.S. Secretary of Energy (Rick Perry). This overrules Secretary Perry’s September 2017 Direction and “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking” to the FERC requiring the establishment of market rules to assure cost recovery for baseload generators.

As discussed in an earlier post, the specific requirement was for FERC to enact rules that allow for “the recovery of costs of fuel-secure generation units that make [the] grid reliable and resilient.” The Direction is premised on a stated concern that the American public needs protection from “the threat of energy outages that could result from the loss of traditional baseload capacity.” The requirement would apply to generation units that can provide essential energy and ancillary reliability services and have a 90-day fuel supply on site in the event of supply disruptions caused by emergencies and extreme weather. Practically speaking, the cost recovery market rules would benefit coal and nuclear generation facilities.

After receiving submissions from a range of parties, the FERC declined to establish new market rules as directed. In coming to this conclusion, the FERC found that existing regional transmission organization (RTO) and independent system operator (ISO) tariffs have not been shown to be unjust and unreasonable and there is no justification for new tariffs. The FERC also noted that there is no evidence that planned generator retirements are a threat to grid resilience. Additionally, the FERC indicated concern that the proposed rules would be unjustly discriminatory or preferential because only some generators could benefit.

Perhaps in an effort to assuage the Secretary of Energy, FERC did initiate a new proceeding to evaluate the resilience of the bulk power system operated by RTOs and ISOs. Those parties are directed to file a range of specified information to allow the FERC to determine if additional action is warranted to address grid resilience. 

Areas of Expertise

Related Categories

Related Blogs

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Ontario | Ratemaking | Energy Policy

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Rejects Hydro One’s Proposed Acquisition of Orillia Power Distribution By David Stevens Apr 18, 2018 On April 12, 2018, the Ontario Energy Board issued a Decision and Order denying Hydro One Inc.’s application to purchase the shares of Orillia Power Distribution Corporation. The OEB’s Decision explains that Hydro One and Orillia Power have failed to establish that there will be no harm to Orilli...

Posted in: Ratemaking | Practice & Procedure | Ontario

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Issues Its First Decision Using “Proportionate Review” By David Stevens Apr 04, 2018 On March 29, 2018, the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) issued a Decision on Scope of Review in an electricity distributor rate application that is being processed under the OEB’s new proportionate review approach. Under that approach, selected local distribution companies (LDCs) can agree to have thei...

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Ratemaking | Facilities

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Issues its Final Report on Wireline Pole Attachment Charges By David Stevens Mar 26, 2018 On March 22, 2018, the Ontario Energy Board issued its Final Report on Wireline Pole Attachment Charges setting the amount that telecom carriers will pay to attach to electricity poles. In the Final Report, the OEB has set a province-wide charge of $43.63 per pole/per attacher/per year.