skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Canada (Federal) | Facilities

Jan 30, 2017

NEB to Restart Energy East Hearing Process

By David Stevens

On January 27, 2017, the National Energy Board (NEB) announced that the new Hearing Panel appointed to review TransCanada's Energy East and Eastern Mainline projects has voided all decisions from the previous panel. This means that the hearing process will have to be restarted, with all prior decisions having no ongoing effect (including the combining of the two applications, the "completeness determination" and the Issues List). This answers questions raised in our earlier post discussing the implications of the appointment of the new Hearing Panel.

The Panel Letter issued by the new Hearing Panel is titled "Consequences of the Energy East Hearing Panel's recusal and how to recommence the Energy East hearing."

A key ruling is that because the previous Hearing Panel has recused itself in response to allegations of a reasonable apprehension of bias, it follows that "all decisions made by the previous panel must be, and are hereby, voided and stricken from the record." Among other things, this means that there is no longer any "completeness determination" or Hearing Order. Effectively, the process must start again.

The Panel Letter indicates that the first item for the Hearing Panel to consider is whether the two applications (Energy East and Eastern Mainline) should be heard together. That is one of the voided determinations from the prior panel. Interested persons are invited to submit comments by February 15, 2017.

Subsequently, the Hearing Panel will issue a draft Issues List for comment. Around the same time, the Hearing Panel will also release a new Environmental Assessment (EA) Factors Document, setting out how the EA will take into account the environmental effects of the project.

After the Issues List is set, the Hearing Panel will consider and confirm the List of Participants for the application(s). For that purpose, the Hearing Panel will consider all "Applications to Participate" filed in the earlier process as well as any additional requests that are filed.

As the following step, the Hearing Panel will invite submissions and make a determination on the completeness of the application(s). For that purpose, the Hearing Panel has indicated that it's not necessary for TransCanada to re-file the applications and that the current filing (including responses to information requests) remains valid. Once the Hearing Panel makes a completeness determination, then the time-limit for the NEB's report on the projects will commence (while this is ordinarily 15 months, the Government did expand the timeframe to 21 months for the earlier Energy East process - see here).

Along with the issuance of the Panel Letter, the NEB has also taken the extraordinary step of publishing "solemn declarations" from the members of the new Hearing Panel to reassure the public that they are "dedicated to undertaking a fair, transparent and thorough review of the Energy East and Eastern Mainline project applications." The "solemn declarations" and associated cover letter provide details about the background of each new member of the Hearing Panel and confirm that they have no conflicts of interest and that they will not discuss the projects with any member of the previous Hearing Panel.

The combined impact of the determinations issued by the NEB is that the Energy East review process will take longer than anticipated. Where the NEB's report on the project had been expected to be issued by March 2018, it is now hard to see how that can happen before the Spring of 2019 (assuming six months to get to a "completeness determination" and then another 21 months for the hearing process).

Related Blogs

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Ratemaking | Facilities

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Issues Its Largest Rate Case Decision Ever By David Stevens Jan 18, 2018 On December 28, 2017, the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) issued its Decision with Reasons in the Ontario Power Generation “Payment Amounts” case, covering the 2017 to 2021 period. Among the notable determinations are an approval of the forecast costs of the Darlington Refurbishment Project and reduct...

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Facilities

Insights EnergyInsider
Ontario Court of Appeal Finds That Gas Utility’s Franchise Agreement Prevails Over Drainage Act By David Stevens Jan 16, 2018 In a decision released on January 10, 2018, the Ontario Court of Appeal found in favour of Union Gas on the question of whether the cost sharing provisions of a model franchise agreement apply to the relocation of a gas pipeline necessitated by drainage works. The Court found that the provisions ...

Posted in: Ratemaking | Practice & Procedure

Insights EnergyInsider
FERC Rejects Secretary of Energy Direction to Assure Cost Recovery for Coal and Nuclear Generators By David Stevens Jan 12, 2018 On January 8, 2018, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an Order terminating a rulemaking proceeding ordered by the U.S. Secretary of Energy (Rick Perry). This overrules Secretary Perry’s September 2017 Direction and “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking” to the FERC requiring the est...