skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Canada (Federal) | Facilities

Jan 12, 2017

NEB Moves Closer to Resuming its Review of the Energy East Proposal

By David Stevens

On January 10, 2017, the National Energy Board (NEB) announced the appointment of the three new panel members who will consider TransCanada's Energy East pipeline project. The hearing panel will be composed of presiding member Don Ferguson, along with Carole Malo and Marc Paquin.

The NEB's announcement follows the abrupt suspension of the Energy East hearing process in September 2016 when the previous hearing panel stepped down after questions were raised about potential conflicts of interest.

It is not clear whether the new hearing panel will endorse and follow the July 20, 2016 Hearing Order for Energy East. As described in a recent news article, at least one environmental group has filed a Notice of Motion (found here), arguing that the current hearing process should be terminated because there is a reasonable apprehension of bias associated with the previous hearing panel and any decisions that they made. The implication is that the process should have to be restarted, rather than resumed.

As we discussed in an earlier post, the existing Hearing Order sets out a process that will allow the NEB's report on the project to be issued by March 2018 (within the prescribed 21-month timeframe), and includes an Issues List indicating the items that the NEB will consider. If the new hearing panel does continue the process previously approved, then the next steps will be the resumption of panel sessions in Montreal, followed by sessions in seven other cities in Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta. After the panel sessions are complete, then the discovery, oral hearing and argument phases would proceed. Presumably, even if there is no change in the process steps to be followed, there will have to be updates to the dates set out in the Hearing Order, and potentially an extension to the date for the NEB's report on the project.

Related Blogs

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Ontario | Consumer Protection

Insights EnergyInsider
Court Denies Certification of Proposed Class Action Against Hydro One By David Stevens Dec 07, 2017 On November 28, 2017, the Ontario Superior Court dismissed a motion to certify a class action against Hydro One Networks Inc. (Hydro One) that sought damages of $100 million related to alleged overcharges resulting from the rollout of a new customer information system (CIS) starting in 2013. As s...

Posted in: Ratemaking | Practice & Procedure | Ontario

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Plans to Introduce “Proportionate Review” of Utility Rate Applications By David Stevens Dec 01, 2017 A recent webinar presented by Ontario Energy Board staff to representatives of Ontario’s electricity distributors sets out the OEB’s plan to link utility performance and regulatory review. As seen in the presentation from the webinar, the OEB intends to employ a more light-handed review process f...

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Climate Change / Renewables

Insights EnergyInsider
Ontario Confirms Updated Cap and Trade Regulations to Link with Quebec and California By David Stevens Nov 30, 2017 Ontario’s Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) has confirmed that a decision has been made to proceed with amended regulations to facilitate the linkage of Ontario’s Cap and Trade program with California and Quebec (discussed in an earlier post). This will ensure tha...