skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Canada (Federal) | Facilities

Jan 12, 2017

NEB Moves Closer to Resuming its Review of the Energy East Proposal

By David Stevens

On January 10, 2017, the National Energy Board (NEB) announced the appointment of the three new panel members who will consider TransCanada's Energy East pipeline project. The hearing panel will be composed of presiding member Don Ferguson, along with Carole Malo and Marc Paquin.

The NEB's announcement follows the abrupt suspension of the Energy East hearing process in September 2016 when the previous hearing panel stepped down after questions were raised about potential conflicts of interest.

It is not clear whether the new hearing panel will endorse and follow the July 20, 2016 Hearing Order for Energy East. As described in a recent news article, at least one environmental group has filed a Notice of Motion (found here), arguing that the current hearing process should be terminated because there is a reasonable apprehension of bias associated with the previous hearing panel and any decisions that they made. The implication is that the process should have to be restarted, rather than resumed.

As we discussed in an earlier post, the existing Hearing Order sets out a process that will allow the NEB's report on the project to be issued by March 2018 (within the prescribed 21-month timeframe), and includes an Issues List indicating the items that the NEB will consider. If the new hearing panel does continue the process previously approved, then the next steps will be the resumption of panel sessions in Montreal, followed by sessions in seven other cities in Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta. After the panel sessions are complete, then the discovery, oral hearing and argument phases would proceed. Presumably, even if there is no change in the process steps to be followed, there will have to be updates to the dates set out in the Hearing Order, and potentially an extension to the date for the NEB's report on the project.

Related Blogs

Posted in: Facilities | Practice & Procedure | Energy Policy | Canada (Federal)

Insights EnergyInsider
Legislation Introduced to Replace the NEB and Project Review Process By David Stevens Feb 14, 2018 On February 8, 2018, the federal government released Bill C-69 titled “An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation Protection Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts.” The new legislation is the culmination of the promise...

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Ratemaking | Facilities

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Issues Its Largest Rate Case Decision Ever By David Stevens Jan 18, 2018 On December 28, 2017, the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) issued its Decision with Reasons in the Ontario Power Generation “Payment Amounts” case, covering the 2017 to 2021 period. Among the notable determinations are an approval of the forecast costs of the Darlington Refurbishment Project and reduct...

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Facilities

Insights EnergyInsider
Ontario Court of Appeal Finds That Gas Utility’s Franchise Agreement Prevails Over Drainage Act By David Stevens Jan 16, 2018 In a decision released on January 10, 2018, the Ontario Court of Appeal found in favour of Union Gas on the question of whether the cost sharing provisions of a model franchise agreement apply to the relocation of a gas pipeline necessitated by drainage works. The Court found that the provisions ...