skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Canada (Federal) | Facilities | Quebec

Apr 29, 2016

New Schedule Issued for the Energy East Pipeline Project Review Processes

By David Stevens

There have been several recent developments in the approval and review process for TransCanada's Energy East pipeline project.

Most significantly, on April 26, 2016, the National Energy Board (NEB) issued a "preliminary timeline" for the hearing process, which indicates that the NEB's report on the project will be issued by March 2018. The timeframe for the NEB's process has been extended to 21 months for the process versus the usual 15 month time limit. That is in keeping with the Federal Government's January 27, 2016 announcement that the time for NEB review of the Energy East project would be extended by six months (see our previous post discussing changes to the interim approach that the Government will require for the review of major projects currently under environmental review). The NEB's report on the project will be presented the Federal Cabinet, who will then have six months to make a decision.

The preliminary timeline is set out below. It anticipates that a consolidated application is expected to be filed by mid-May. This follows a direction by the NEB (discussed in a previous post) for the applicant to address the NEB's concern that the application in its present form was too difficult for even experts to navigate, let alone for the public to comprehend. In a letter to Energy East (TransCanada), the NEB indicated that it has not yet determined the Application to be complete and that the completeness determination is an initial threshold question to be decided.

The NEB has indicated that it expects to gather input from hearing participants on what process elements the participants would like to see included in the review. The NEB will use this feedback to design the review process. The proposed dates for the NEB review process are as follows:

Expected Process StepExpected Timing
Filing of Consolidated Application by Energy East Pipeline Ltd.Mid-May 2016
Issuance of List of ParticipantsEarly June 2016
Issuance of Hearing Order (including completeness determination)Mid-June 2016
Panel Sessions in communities along pipeline routeAugust-December 2016
Written Process for ParticipantsJanuary-May 2017
Draft Conditions for CommentMid 2017
Final ArgumentNovember - December 2017
NEB Report to Governor in CouncilMarch 2018

A second recent development is the decision by TransCanada to voluntarily participate in the Quebec environmental assessment process. As we previously discussed, the Quebec Government has asserted that there should be a review by the province's Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement (BAPE) to consider environmental impacts of the Energy East project within Quebec. TransCanada had resisted this. In response, the Quebec Government sought an injunction to require TransCanada to comply with the Quebec Environmental Quality Act and file environmental assessment documents for the Quebec portion of the project. Now, according to recent news reports (see here and here ), TransCanada has agreed to submit an environmental impact study to the BAPE by early June, and the Quebec Government has agreed to withdraw its injunction application. Given this development, there will be no court hearing or decision that would clarify the extent to which this provincial regulator has jurisdiction to review an interprovincial pipeline project.

Related Blogs

Posted in: Facilities | Practice & Procedure | Energy Policy | Canada (Federal)

Insights EnergyInsider
Legislation Introduced to Replace the NEB and Project Review Process By David Stevens Feb 14, 2018 On February 8, 2018, the federal government released Bill C-69 titled “An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation Protection Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts.” The new legislation is the culmination of the promise...

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Ratemaking | Facilities

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Issues Its Largest Rate Case Decision Ever By David Stevens Jan 18, 2018 On December 28, 2017, the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) issued its Decision with Reasons in the Ontario Power Generation “Payment Amounts” case, covering the 2017 to 2021 period. Among the notable determinations are an approval of the forecast costs of the Darlington Refurbishment Project and reduct...

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Facilities

Insights EnergyInsider
Ontario Court of Appeal Finds That Gas Utility’s Franchise Agreement Prevails Over Drainage Act By David Stevens Jan 16, 2018 In a decision released on January 10, 2018, the Ontario Court of Appeal found in favour of Union Gas on the question of whether the cost sharing provisions of a model franchise agreement apply to the relocation of a gas pipeline necessitated by drainage works. The Court found that the provisions ...