skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Canada (Federal) | Practice & Procedure | Facilities

Oct 5, 2017

TransCanada Abandons Energy East Project

By David Stevens

On October 5, 2017, TransCanada Corporation announced that it will not proceed with the Energy East and Eastern Mainline projects. As a result, TransCanada will withdraw its applications to the National Energy Board (NEB) for these projects.

It can be assumed that one reason (though likely not the only reason) for TransCanada’s decision is the difficulty associated with the NEB’s review process. As we explained in earlier posts (see here and here), the NEB process had to be re-started after allegations of conflict of interest were raised, and then the new process was expanded to include consideration of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with upstream (production) and downstream (consumers) users of the crude oil to be transported.

Other pipeline projects planned to transport crude oil from Alberta have also run into difficulty in their regulatory approval processes.

Enbridge’s Northern Gateway project received conditional support from the NEB and was approved by the federal government, but the Federal Court of Appeal quashed two Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity issued for the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline in June 2016 (see here). In that case, the Court found the federal government failed in its constitutional duty to consult Aboriginal peoples prior to directing the NEB to issue the Certificates. Enbridge did not appeal the decision, and the Northern Gateway project is not proceeding.

Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain expansion project has been approved by the federal government and the NEB, but those approvals are currently being challenged in a Federal Court of Appeal proceeding. As explained in an earlier post, the opponents in that case raise issues about (among other things) administrative law, obligations owed to First Nations and Indigenous peoples and the environmental effects of the project. The appeal hearing is underway, and a decision is expected to be issued relatively quickly.

Taken together, these cases illustrate the challenges that pipeline operators face in achieving final regulatory approval for large new projects. It will be interesting to see whether the federal government’s initiative to “modernize” the NEB (described here) has any impact (positive or negative) on future applications. 

Areas of Expertise

Related Blogs

Posted in: Climate Change / Renewables | Energy Policy | Canada (Federal)

Insights EnergyInsider
NEB Predicts Canadian Fossil Fuel Use Will Peak in 2019 By Sean Green and David Stevens Nov 02, 2017 The National Energy Board (NEB) now predicts Canadian’s use of fossil fuels will peak around 2019. In a shift from previous years, the NEB’s report released in October 2017, titled Canada’s Energy Future 2017: Energy Supply and Demand Projections to 2040, credits advances in technology and climat...

Posted in: Facilities | Practice & Procedure | Canada (Federal)

Insights EnergyInsider
NEB Publishes Interactive Pipeline Incidents Tool By David Stevens Oct 26, 2017 Recently, the National Energy Board (NEB) published an interactive online tool that helps users access and review a wide range of information about pipeline incidents at NEB-regulated pipelines and facilities. This tool allows interested parties to find, compare, sort and review data about “repor...

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Facilities | Canada (Federal)

Insights EnergyInsider
Court Orders Government to Reconsider its Approval of an Assignment of an Easement Related to the Trans Mountain Pipeline By David Stevens and Dillon Collett Oct 05, 2017 In a decision related to the Trans Mountain pipeline, the Federal Court of Appeal has decided against Kinder Morgan and the Federal Government. In Coldwater Indian Band v. Canada (Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), issued on September 26, 2017, the FCA held that the Minister of Indigen...