skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Canada (Federal) | Facilities

Sep 5, 2017

Federal Court of Appeal Reluctantly Allows BC Attorney General to Intervene in Trans Mountain Appeal

By David Stevens

On August 29, 2017, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) issued a Decision allowing the Attorney General of British Columbia (AG-BC) to intervene in an appeal of the Federal Government’s approval for the expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline. It is worth noting, though, that the FCA’s Decision includes criticism of and strict conditions for the AG-BC.

The Trans Mountain expansion project was reviewed by the National Energy Board (NEB) through a process culminating with a May 2016 Report. Subsequently, in November 2016, the Federal Government issued its approval of the project, setting out 157 conditions to be met. The approved Trans Mountain expansion project will add new pipeline as well as other facilities (such as pump stations and tanks and the expansion of an existing marine terminal) to an existing 1,150-kilometre pipeline that runs from Edmonton, Alberta to Burnaby, British Columbia. The project is forecast to cost more than $7.4 billion and will increase capacity from 300,000 barrels per day to 890,000 barrels per day.

Almost immediately after the Trans Mountain expansion project was approved, a large number of appeals were commenced against the Federal Government’s decision. These appeals raise issues about (among other things) administrative law, obligations owed to First Nations and Indigenous peoples and the environmental effects of the project. The appeals were consolidated by the FCA, and an expedited schedule with a hearing in October 2017 was set. The FCA set a deadline in April 2017 for non-parties to apply for intervenor status. At that time, the Attorney General of Alberta (which supports the project) applied and was granted intervenor status. There was no application made by the AG-BC.

On August 22, 2017, the AG-BC sought leave to intervene in the Trans Mountain appeal. This was more than one month after the new BC Government (NDP) assumed power. As set out in the request for intervention, the AG-BC opposes the Trans Mountain project.

The FCA issued its Decision on the AG-BC’s intervention request within one week. The FCA noted the relatively low standard that an AG must meet for intervenor status (the appeal must raise a question of general importance that impacts the population of the province) and determined that intervenor status should be granted. However, Justice Stratas indicated his displeasure with the AG-BC’s lax approach in the case, including the slowness of the intervention request and the lack of specificity around the positions that the AG-BC will advance. The FCA imposed strict conditions on the AG-BC’s intervention, including a requirement to meet existing deadlines and a strong direction to keep the intervention within the scope of the issues and evidence already advanced in the proceeding.

The FCA is scheduled to hear the Trans Mountain appeal over seven days starting on October 2, 2017. As set out in the Decision, the time set aside for this hearing is the longest in the FCA’s history. Given the FCA’s recognition of the public interest in expediting the case, it can be expected that a decision on the appeal will be issued relatively soon after the hearing. 

Areas of Expertise

Related Blogs

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Ratemaking | Facilities

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Issues Its Largest Rate Case Decision Ever By David Stevens Jan 18, 2018 On December 28, 2017, the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) issued its Decision with Reasons in the Ontario Power Generation “Payment Amounts” case, covering the 2017 to 2021 period. Among the notable determinations are an approval of the forecast costs of the Darlington Refurbishment Project and reduct...

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Facilities

Insights EnergyInsider
Ontario Court of Appeal Finds That Gas Utility’s Franchise Agreement Prevails Over Drainage Act By David Stevens Jan 16, 2018 In a decision released on January 10, 2018, the Ontario Court of Appeal found in favour of Union Gas on the question of whether the cost sharing provisions of a model franchise agreement apply to the relocation of a gas pipeline necessitated by drainage works. The Court found that the provisions ...

Posted in: Ratemaking | Practice & Procedure

Insights EnergyInsider
FERC Rejects Secretary of Energy Direction to Assure Cost Recovery for Coal and Nuclear Generators By David Stevens Jan 12, 2018 On January 8, 2018, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an Order terminating a rulemaking proceeding ordered by the U.S. Secretary of Energy (Rick Perry). This overrules Secretary Perry’s September 2017 Direction and “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking” to the FERC requiring the est...