skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Ontario | Climate Change / Renewables | Quebec

Mar 2, 2017

A Return to Poor Results in the Latest California/Quebec Carbon Credit Auction

By David Stevens

On March 1, 2017, the Quebec and California governments announced the results of the tenth Cap and Trade System Joint Auction. The results show that very few of the available greenhouse gas allowances (credits) offered for sale were purchased (around 16.5%). This is a huge decline from the prior auction where around 90% of available credits were sold (described in an earlier post). The current results are more in line with the other 2016 auctions (described in earlier posts here and here), where most credits went unsold. Once again, the result is lower revenues for the governments - according to a news report, the California government will only receive around $8.2 million, rather than the $600 million that could have been received if all credits were sold.

Ontario's first Cap and Trade Program Auction of Greenhouse Gas Allowances will be held on March 22, 2017. As we described in a recent post, the reserve price for the Ontario auction will be calculated in the same manner as for the California/Quebec Cap and Trade System Joint Auction. Notably, however, the initial Ontario auctions will not be linked to the Joint Auction until 2018. That means that the proceeds from all credits purchased in the 2017 Ontario auctions will go to the Ontario government.

As we have previously noted, Ontario's Environmental Commissioner has identified a concern that the California market (assuming it continues with Cap and Trade, which is not a sure thing) will have abundant supplies of credits. This may mean that some of the amounts spent for credits by Ontario emitters after 2017 will go outside the province, thereby reducing proceeds from the sale of credits available to fund Ontario's Climate Change Action Plan. If those proceeds are lower than expected, it is likely that the scope of the programs under the Climate Change Action Plan will have to be revisited and reduced.

Related Blogs

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Ratemaking | Facilities

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Issues Its Largest Rate Case Decision Ever By David Stevens Jan 18, 2018 On December 28, 2017, the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) issued its Decision with Reasons in the Ontario Power Generation “Payment Amounts” case, covering the 2017 to 2021 period. Among the notable determinations are an approval of the forecast costs of the Darlington Refurbishment Project and reduct...

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Facilities

Insights EnergyInsider
Ontario Court of Appeal Finds That Gas Utility’s Franchise Agreement Prevails Over Drainage Act By David Stevens Jan 16, 2018 In a decision released on January 10, 2018, the Ontario Court of Appeal found in favour of Union Gas on the question of whether the cost sharing provisions of a model franchise agreement apply to the relocation of a gas pipeline necessitated by drainage works. The Court found that the provisions ...

Posted in: Utility Mergers | Ratemaking | Practice & Procedure | Ontario

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Allows Review Motions in Hydro One/Orillia Power Proceeding By Fred D. Cass Jan 10, 2018 In August 2017, we wrote about a Procedural Order issued by the Ontario Energy Board in which the OEB adjourned the hearing of an application (“MAADs” application) by Hydro One Inc. for approval to acquire Orillia Power Distribution Corporation until a decision on Hydro One’s distribution rate ap...