skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Ontario

Jan 11, 2016

Criminal Law and Health and Safety Law Converge to Enforce Duties Against All Workplace Parties

By Cynthia R. C. Sefton

On January 11, 2016, the project manager in one of the prosecutions arising from a tragic December 24, 2009 incident was sentenced. During this incident, four men died and a fifth suffered serious injuries after the collapse of a swing stage at a high-rise building on which they were working. Amongst other problems at the site, there were insufficient safety lines for all the workers on the swing stage.

Both Criminal Code charges and provincial health and safety charges were laid against a wide array of those responsible for the project.

In June 2015, project manager Vadim Kazenelson was found guilty on four counts of criminal negligence causing death and one count of criminal negligence causing bodily harm. He himself was on the swing stage, but managed to hold onto a balcony. The trial judge held that in order to determine whether the defendant fell below the appropriate standard of care, the Court could consider the requirements of provincial health and safety legislation and whether those were met. Today, Mr. Kazenelson was sentenced to 3½ years in prison. The Crown had sought 4 to 5 years and the defence sought 1 to 2 years. The conviction is under appeal, so the case is not over.

The employer, Metron Construction, had previously pleaded guilty to criminal negligence causing death and put forward evidence of financial difficulties. The Ontario Court of Appeal raised the company's fine to $750,000 from the trial sentence of $200,000 .

A Metron director had been charged under both the Criminal Code and provincial health and safety legislation. He pleaded guilty to the provincial offences and received a fine of $90,000 for failing to ensure that the company followed the Ontario requirements for scaffolding. The Criminal Code charges were withdrawn. Of note is that the supplier of the swing stage was fined $350,000 on a guilty plea under the provincial legislation for the failure to ensure that the platform it supplied was in good condition.

These penalties serve as a reminder to companies and to individuals that the law treats workplace deaths and serious injuries with a high degree of gravity. In the last several years, all parties involved in such incidents, including individual directors and supervisors, have come under increasing scrutiny for the roles they play leading to the deaths. Investigations are conducted under both provincial legislation and under the now 11-year old Bill C-45 amendments to the Criminal Code.

Aside from the legal implications, there is of course the high human costs of lives lost and lasting injuries for what may well be a preventable situation. The importance of early identification of risks, and the design and implementation of real solutions to address those risks, cannot be overemphasized.

Related Categories

Related Blogs

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Ratemaking | Facilities

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Issues Its Largest Rate Case Decision Ever By David Stevens Jan 18, 2018 On December 28, 2017, the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) issued its Decision with Reasons in the Ontario Power Generation “Payment Amounts” case, covering the 2017 to 2021 period. Among the notable determinations are an approval of the forecast costs of the Darlington Refurbishment Project and reduct...

Posted in: Ontario | Practice & Procedure | Facilities

Insights EnergyInsider
Ontario Court of Appeal Finds That Gas Utility’s Franchise Agreement Prevails Over Drainage Act By David Stevens Jan 16, 2018 In a decision released on January 10, 2018, the Ontario Court of Appeal found in favour of Union Gas on the question of whether the cost sharing provisions of a model franchise agreement apply to the relocation of a gas pipeline necessitated by drainage works. The Court found that the provisions ...

Posted in: Utility Mergers | Ratemaking | Practice & Procedure | Ontario

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Allows Review Motions in Hydro One/Orillia Power Proceeding By Fred D. Cass Jan 10, 2018 In August 2017, we wrote about a Procedural Order issued by the Ontario Energy Board in which the OEB adjourned the hearing of an application (“MAADs” application) by Hydro One Inc. for approval to acquire Orillia Power Distribution Corporation until a decision on Hydro One’s distribution rate ap...