skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Alberta | Consumer Protection

Nov 13, 2015

AUC Approves $56 Million Payment From TransAlta For Price Manipulation

By David Stevens

The Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC) has now approved the payment of $56 million by TransAlta Corporation (TransAlta) as an appropriate sanction for the finding that TransAlta had engaged in conduct that did not support the fair, efficient and openly competitive operation of Alberta's electricity market. We described the AUC's findings in an earlier post.

As described in another earlier post, the $56 million payment is the subject of a settlement between TransAlta and the Alberta Market Surveillance Administrator (MSA). The payment is comprised of disgorgement of economic benefits ($27 million), penalty ($25 million) and payment of MSA investigative costs ($4 million).

The settlement was presented to the AUC by the MSA and TransAlta as part of a Consent Order. After determining that it has jurisdiction to accept the Consent Order, the AUC then addressed whether settlement is in the public interest. The AUC found that a settlement or joint submission on an appropriate penalty should be accepted as long as it falls within a range of acceptable outcomes in the circumstances. It is not appropriate for the AUC to insist upon an outcome that is identical to what it would have fashioned itself. Taking that approach, the AUC found that the Consent Order is in the public interest, and should be approved. In coming to this conclusion, the AUC acknowledged that while the penalty part of the payment ($25 million) is quite high, the seriousness of the contraventions support such a penalty.

As explained in our earlier post, the $56 million payment will go to the Alberta Government's general revenue fund. This is what the Act requires. There will be no direct compensation for affected consumers. It remains to be seen whether there will be any private litigation, such as a class action, seeking consumer compensation.

Related Blogs

Posted in: Canada (Federal) | Practice & Procedure | Facilities

Insights EnergyInsider
TransCanada Abandons Energy East Project By David Stevens Oct 05, 2017 On October 5, 2017, TransCanada Corporation announced that it will not proceed with the Energy East and Eastern Mainline projects. As a result, TransCanada will withdraw its applications to the National Energy Board for these projects.

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Facilities | Canada (Federal)

Insights EnergyInsider
Court Orders Government to Reconsider its Approval of an Assignment of an Easement Related to the Trans Mountain Pipeline By David Stevens and Dillon Collett Oct 05, 2017 In a decision related to the Trans Mountain pipeline, the Federal Court of Appeal has decided against Kinder Morgan and the Federal Government. In Coldwater Indian Band v. Canada (Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), issued on September 26, 2017, the FCA held that the Minister of Indigen...

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Ratemaking

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Allows Correction of Error From 2011 Rates Proceeding By Fred D. Cass Sep 22, 2017 On September 21, 2017, the Ontario Energy Board issued a decision in which it ordered Natural Resource Gas Limited (NRG) to correct the reference prices used in NRG’s Purchased Gas Transportation Variance Account (PGTVA) for fiscal years 2011 to 2015. NRG records in the PGTVA, on a monthly ...