skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Energy Policy | Ontario | Alberta | Ratemaking

Apr 7, 2015

Alberta Utilities Commission Reduces Utility Cost of Capital

By David Stevens

In a March 2015 decision, the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC) set the generic cost of capital for 2013 to 2015 for the utilities that it regulates. In the decision, the AUC reduced cost of capital parameters applicable to the utilities that it regulates. This decision will most likely be cited and reviewed if and when the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) proceeds with its promised cost of capital review. The AUC decision is found here.

The AUC found that the appropriate Return on Equity (ROE) for the utilities that it regulates is 8.3% for 2013 to 2015. This determination was based upon a review of various tests used to evaluate appropriate ROE. The determination was supported by findings that there is an overall improvement in global financial markets and that, in this environment of historically low interest rates, the days of double digit expected returns are behind us in the near term. The AUC's approved ROE level is well below the 10.5% requested by utilities, and is below the current 9.3% ROE approved by the OEB for Ontario utilities.

The AUC decided not to reintroduce a formulaic approach to set ROE for future years. While not closing the door on this approach for the future, the AUC agreed with the positions of several parties that a formulaic approach should not be reinstituted until market conditions (i.e. interest rates and bond yields) return to a range of normalcy.

The AUC also reduced the "equity ratio" for the utilities that it regulates by 1%. This means that the approved ROE will apply to a smaller proportion of a utility's rate base. In coming to this decision, the AUC found that this level would be sufficient for utilities to maintain a high credit rating.

The OEB's 2014-2017 Business Plan indicates that the OEB will "complete" its review of its current approach to the cost of capital in 2014, and will implement any modifications in 2015. The stated reason for the review is to ensure that the approach continues to meet the fair return standard. There has not yet been any public process from the OEB to review its cost of capital approach. It seems fair to expect that the AUC's detailed decision will be relied upon by parties who seek to reduce the approved cost of capital for Ontario utilities.

Related Blogs

Posted in: Nova Scotia | Climate Change / Renewables | Facilities | Energy Policy

Insights EnergyInsider
Proposed Amendments to Increase Innovation and Development in Marine Renewable Energy Sector By David Stevens and Rebecca Hines Oct 11, 2017 On October 5, 2017, the Government of Nova Scotia announced that it will amend its Marine Renewable-energy Act to make it easier for tidal technology developers “to assess innovative, lower-cost tidal energy technologies” and bring their technologies to market faster. The amendments are also inte...

Posted in: Energy Policy | U.S. | Climate Change / Renewables

Insights EnergyInsider
U.S. Secretary of Energy Directs Regulator to Assure Cost Recovery for Coal and Nuclear Generators By David Stevens Oct 10, 2017 In late September 2017, the U.S. Secretary of Energy (Rick Perry) issued a Direction and “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking” to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) requiring the establishment of market rules to assure cost recovery for baseload generators. The specific requirement is for ...

Posted in: Ontario | Climate Change / Renewables | Ratemaking | Energy Policy

Insights EnergyInsider
OEB Approves Gas Utilities’ 2017 Cap and Trade Compliance Plans By Dennis M. O'Leary Sep 27, 2017 On September 21, 2017, the Ontario Energy Board issued its public and confidential decisions approving the 2017 Cap and Trade Compliance Plans filed by the three Gas Utilities subject to certain minor administrative adjustments. The Board approved the total estimated cost consequences for rate ma...