skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Intellectual Property

Feb 8, 2018

Human Rights Complaint on “Chief Wahoo” (Cleveland Indians) Logo to Proceed – Update on Law of Controversial Sports Logos

By Ken Clark and Shannon L. Corregan

In October 2016, hours before a championship series game between the Cleveland Indians and the Toronto Blue Jays, Douglas Cardinal, an Anishnaabe elder, commenced an application at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO), alleging that the name of the Cleveland Indians and their “Chief Wahoo” logo constituted discrimination contrary to the Ontario Human Rights Code.

At the preliminary hearing, Major League Baseball (MLB) argued that this was a trademark dispute, not a human rights dispute. The Tribunal disagreed and held that the Code did apply, given that Mr. Cardinal was only seeking narrow relief – to restrict the use of the name and logo at baseball games held at the Rogers Centre in Toronto.

MLB appealed to review this finding of jurisdiction to the Ontario Divisional Court. In a decision dated January 30, 2018, the Court held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the merits of the decision. “I accept that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over trade marks,” Justice Kiteley, for the Court, stated, “but it does not have jurisdiction over the claim by Mr. Cardinal that he has experienced discrimination pursuant to the Code.”

The case highlights the unexpectedly significant role that trademark law can play in modern society. While the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously declared in January 2017 that trademark laws banning offensive names are unconstitutional, as they infringe upon the First Amendment, the state of trademark law in Canada remains more nuanced.

Osgoode Hall law professor Carys Craig argues in an upcoming paper that the commercial use of both the name “Indians” and the Chief Wahoo logo could – and should – be prohibited in Canada under s. 9(1)(j) of the Trade-marks Act.

MLB (or at least the Cleveland Indians) appears to be listening to the winds of change. Last week, on Jan. 29, 2018, the team announced that it would no longer be using the Chief Wahoo logo on their uniforms beginning in 2019. Will this be the first domino in the chain? This case opens up the possibility that the HRTO may be receiving more of these applications in the future – and other MLB teams may want to take notice.

Areas of Expertise

Related Categories

Related Blogs

Posted in: Intellectual Property

Insights TheSpotlight
World IP Day 2018 Theme Announced By SuMei Cheung, P.Eng. Feb 23, 2018 Observed every April 26, World Intellectual Property Day was established by World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO) to raise awareness of the impacts of IP on our daily life. WIPO has announced that this year’s theme for World Intellectual Property Day will be: Powering Change: Women in Innovat...

Posted in: Intellectual Property

Insights TheSpotlight
Online Advertising Method Survives Alice at the PTAB By Tony Sabeta, B.Eng. Feb 20, 2018 In 2012, a fledgling startup, AdSupply Inc., filed a patent application for a method for delivering leave behind ads which are displayed behind the browser window when a user leaves a website. These ads are considered to be one of the most effective ad formats for high viewability and user engage...

Posted in: Intellectual Property

Insights TheSpotlight
Patented Love: Our Selection of Innovations for the Romantic at Heart By SuMei Cheung, P.Eng. Feb 14, 2018 With Valentine’s Day upon us, one would rightly suspect that there is already an abundance of patents and patent applications related to online dating software. But if you're really in the mood for love, here are some less obvious technologies dedicated to romance.