skip to main content
Back to all blog posts

Posted in: Energy Policy | Climate Change / Renewables

Jun 29, 2017

California's Supreme Court Confirms Dismissal of Challenge to Cap and Trade Program

By David Stevens

On June 28, 2017, the California Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of a case that had confirmed the constitutionality of California's Cap and Trade Program. As explained in a news article, this marks the end of the current legal challenges to the Cap and Trade program in California.

As we discussed in an earlier post, the appeal had been brought by the California Chamber of Commerce and was supported by manufacturers and others. At issue in the appeal was whether the auction sale of emissions credits under California’s Cap and Trade program amounts to a tax. If so, then the program would be unconstitutional because it did not receive approval from two-thirds of both houses of the California legislature. On April 6, 2017, the California Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District had issued a decision dismissing an appeal of a lower court decision that had upheld the constitutionality of California’s Cap and Trade Program. The California Supreme Court’s decision denies any further appeal. This means that California’s Cap and Trade Program will continue under the current legislation. 

In the meantime, the California Legislature is currently considering whether and how to extend the Cap and Trade Program beyond the 2020 expiration date. A recent news report indicates that efforts are continuing to find a way to achieve two-third legislative support to extend California’s Cap and Trade Program and effectively shield the program from future legal challenges. 

The future status of California’s participation in Cap and Trade is important for Ontario, which is planning to join the WCI Cap and Trade auction process in 2018.

Related Blogs

Posted in: Practice & Procedure | Ontario | Energy Policy

Insights EnergyInsider
Ontario Superior Court Dismisses Claim Challenging Sale of Hydro One Shares By David Stevens Aug 18, 2017 On August 14, 2017, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released a decision dismissing a claim made by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) against the Ontario government related to the sale of shares of Hydro One Networks Inc. to the public. The Court dismissed CUPE’s claim as b...

Posted in: Energy Policy | Ratemaking | Alberta

Insights EnergyInsider
Alberta Utilities Commission Comments on Deemed and Actual Equity Ratios By Fred D. Cass Aug 03, 2017 On November 30, 2016, ENMAX Power Corporation applied to the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC) for approval of a deemed equity ratio of 37 per cent for its distribution and transmission functions for 2016 and 2017. In its earlier generic cost of capital decision (Decision 20622-D01-2016), the AU...
Energy Storage Developments in Canada, the U.S. and Beyond in the Last Twelve Months By David Stevens and Jasmine Chung Jul 27, 2017 The topic of energy storage has been front and centre in the energy world in the past twelve months. As discussed previously (here and here), energy storage has been referred to by many commentators as a "game changer" because it will greatly improve the efficient use of electricity resources (ge...